Embracing its recentremovalfrom the U.S. State Department'slistofdesignated foreign terrorist organizations,theMujahedeen-e Khalq(MEK), an exiled Iranianterrorcultwithdeep pocketsandclose tiesto theWashingtonestablishment, is attempting to ramp up fearmongering andpropagandaover Iran's nuclear program following last month's election of moderate cleric Hassan Rouhani as the Islamic Republic's next president.In April 2013, the groupopenedan office in Washington, D.C. and officiallyregisteredas a lobbying organization the following month.
Now, aReutersarticlefrom July 11, 2013 reported that the MEK and its affiliate organizations such as the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) claim to have "obtained reliable information on a new and completely secret site designated for [Iran's] nuclear project," despite providing no credible evidence to back up the allegation.
The supposed site is said to be "located in a complex of tunnels beneath mountains 10 km (6 miles) east of the town of Damavand, itself about 50 km northeast of Tehran." The MEK claimed that construction of the site began in 2006 and was recently completed. "The site consists of four tunnels and has been constructed by a group of engineering and construction companies associated with the engineering arms of the Ministry of Defence and the IRGC (Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards force)," a statement from MEK said.
Unsurprisingly, the Iranian government immediatelydeniedthe allegations.
As in nearly all media reports on the MEK,Reuterscredits the group with having "exposed Iran's uranium enrichment facility at Natanz and a heavy water facility at Arak" in 2002. But beyond the fact that Iran's nuclear program wasnever a secret, this specific claim is untrue, as nuclear experts Jeffrey Lewis and Mark Hibbspointed outback in 2006.
In fact, the U.S. intelligence community had been tracking Iran's nuclear facility development for quite some time, notably its construction at both Natanz and Arak. Lewis notes that in 2002, "someone leaked that information to an Iranian dissident group, the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), which then released the second-hand dope in a press conference where they got the details wrong." The information the MEK supposedly gleans from sources inside Iran are actually just leaks received from intelligence agencies in the United States and Israel.
Since then, the MEK hasnot providedasingle shredof credible information regarding Iran's nuclear program. Furthermore, in early 2007, an unnamed senior official at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)revealedto theLos Angeles Times, "Since 2002, pretty much all the intelligence that's come to us has proved to be wrong" and has never led to significant discoveries inside Iran.
"They gave us a paper with a list of sites. [The inspectors] did some follow-up, they went to some military sites, but there was no sign of [banned nuclear] activities," the officialtoldThe Guardianat the time. Additionally, theLA Timesreported that "U.S. officials privately acknowledge that much of their evidence on Iran's nuclear plans and programs remains ambiguous, fragmented and difficult to prove."
Additionally, theAssociated Pressreportedthis past May that, when it comes to accusations about the Iranian nuclear program and despite their terrible track record, "about 80% of the intelligence comes from the United States and its allies."
Reuters, writing about the MEK's most recent revelation, noted, "The group released satellite photographs of what it said was the site. But the images did not appear to constitute hard evidence to support the assertion that it was a planned nuclear facility." Clearly, a non-state actor like the MEK doesn't have satellites of its own floating around in space taking pictures of Iranian mountains. It's obviously getting the information from government organizations withadvanced spying resources.
Though these latest claims by the MEK have garnered quite a bit of attention this week, they are, in fact, nothing new. Allegations about tunnel systems have long been a go-to source of alarmism over Iran's nuclear program. Back in January 2010, on the heels of promoting anopinion piecethat explicitly advocated an unprovoked military attack on Iran,The New York Times' William Broad published ahysterical report, which claimed, "Over the past decade, Iran has quietly hidden an increasingly large part of its atomic complex in networks of tunnels and bunkers across the country."
The report goes on to lament that Iranian efforts to protect their own nuclear infrastructure from military attack is viewed by the U.S. administration as "a stealth weapon, complicating the West's military and geopolitical calculus." Translation:It's harder to spy on things and then blow them up when they're not out in the open and that's annoying.
Broad doesn't even try to mask the frustration:"It complicates your targeting," said Richard L. Russell, a former Central Intelligence Agency analyst now at the National Defense University. "We're used to facilities being above ground. Underground, it becomes literally a black hole. You can't be sure what's taking place."Even the Israelis concede that solid rock can render bombs useless. Late last month, the Israeli defense minister, Ehud Barak, told Parliament that the Qum plant was "located in bunkers that cannot be destroyed through a conventional attack."
So despite the decades of threats from the United States and Israel, then-U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates didn't realize the blistering irony when, discussing the heavily-fortified uranium enrichment site at Fordow, he said, "If they wanted it for peaceful purposes, there's no reason to put it so deep underground, no reason to be deceptive about it, keep it a secret for a protracted period of time."
Later in his report, Broad describes Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as a tunnel aficionado and quotes Greg Duckworth, a "civilian scientist" described as having "recently led a Pentagon research effort to pinpoint enemy tunnels," as saying, "Deeply buried targets have been a problem forever. And it's getting worse."
Broad's record of dishonesty goes beyond this one report. In 2009, he quoted the Los Alamos National Laboratory's Frank Pabian, saying of the MEK, "They're right 90% of the time. That doesn't mean they're perfect, but 90% is a pretty good record." Mohamed El-Baradei, former IAEA director-general, had a different take on the group. "We followed whatever they came up with. And a lot of it was bogus."
In his reporting, William Broad never once identifies the MEK or NCRI as an officially designated terrorist group, which at the time they both were and had been for over a decade.
To hammer home how deliberately alarmist the claims actually were, theTimeseven published the article with a photograph of a smiling Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his entourage in red hardhats emerging from what is apparently supposed to resemble a steel-reinforced underground lair. Yet the photo is wholly unrelated to any of the allegations made within the report.
The caption beneath of the picture reads, "President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran, center, at a highway tunnel near Tehran. Much of Iran's atomic work is also in tunnels."
By Policy Mic
The Iran Project is not responsible for the content of quoted articles.
