Since his inauguration on August 4, President Rouhani has tried to apply his foreign policy of moderation to the Syrian conflict. While other Iranian officials have blamed insurgents for the August 21 chemical weapons attacks and used the derogatory label Takfiris to depict Muslim heretics backed by a US-Israeli-Saudi plot, Rouhani has limited his comments to condemnation of chemical weapons citing Irans suffering from Iraqi attacks in the 1980s and a call for a political resolution.
On Friday, however, Rouhani was quoted as telling a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization:
We believe that arming extremist and takfiri groups, and especially these groups access to chemical weapons, is the greatest danger for regional peace and security and must be paid attention to in all plans. In addition, all measures to reach a political solution must condemn and neutralize any threats and reliance on force.
Did Rouhani really use these words, including his implied link of insurgents to the August 21 attacks and the takfiri description?
The report is in Fars News, the outlet of the Revolutionary Guards, which has been waging an all-out campaign for a hard-line approach to Syria, and which has been known to exaggerate and even falsify comments.
And theres another curiosity. When State outlet Press TV first posted its account on Friday, it put Takfiri use of chemical weapons front-and-center. This morning, there is a shift: while Rouhanis alleged comments are untouched, the headline has been altered to Militants Access to Chemical Arms Threatens Regional Security.