data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e57c/1e57c1edd40f73875dcdaf5a820d3c09d9c49e2a" alt="Hossein Amir-Abdollahian"
The two rounds of negotiations between the Syrian government and the opposition, talks which ended fruitlessly in Geneva, suffered from fundamental flaws in form and content. Shortcomings in form mainly because not all political blocs were represented, the composition of participants was uneven and certain supporters of terrorist groups were permitted to attend. Indifference tothe realities of the Syrian arena,including thefight against terrorism,disregard for the genuine desires of the Syrian people and attempts to impose a foreign willmade the content of the negotiations deficient.
Geneva ll was in fact a political sideshow that did not contribute to finding a political resolution to the Syrian crisis, for the simple reason that some insisted on working on the solution with unrealistic expectations and in a closed laboratory setting.
Read more here
The Iran Project is not responsible for the content of quoted articles.