The Guardian | Tom Whyman: Sure, Twitter has a lot of ill-informed blowhards. But dont dismiss on-the-ground voices and those who hold powerful pundits to account
On Friday, I woke up to the news that the third world war had started. In the Middle East, a man named Qassem Suleimani, the commander of Irans al-Quds force, had been killed in a US drone strike. What followed was one of those strange, fevered days in which the whole of existence seems on the brink of collapse, in which the victory of the stupidest and worst people alive becomes horribly, undeniably apparent, in which it becomes impossible to stop refreshing social media as you attempt to track the disaster in real time.
For most people in the west, the experience was literally just: Donald Trump has decided to kill this guy who you have almost certainly never heard of (just look at this spike for Qasem Soleimani on Google Trends it was biggest in the DC region, interestingly enough, so theres every chance a lot of Washington insiders hadnt even heard of Suleimani themselves), and now, apparently, this means that either you will die, or everyone in the Middle East will die, or both.