American Herald Tribune | �MIKO PELED: Jeremy Corbyn�is arguably not only one of the most popular leaders in the West today, he is also the most promising to those who care for progressive causes. This presents a problem for Israel who fears a strong leader who does not shy away from expressing support for the Palestinian people. One can safely argue that Israel and its multiple tentacles around the world will stop at nothing to prevent Corbyn from entering Downing Street 10.

What makes it even more problematic for Israel is that Britts clearly want Jeremy Corbyn to be their next prime minister. He has managed to increase Labor Party membership to unprecedented numbers and polls show that his clear vision, honesty, and casual charisma made him the favorite among many Britts. In a�poll taken in September�2017, �a mere 19% of people aged 18 to 34 think the Tories are on their side compared with 53% who say�Jeremy Corbyn�and the Labor party are. According to the�Mail Online, Jeremy Corbyn's popularity has soared since the�elections of June 2017.

It is no secret that Israel invests heavily to make sure that monarchs and presidents, prime ministers and emirs around the world stand with Israel and dare not support the Palestinian cause. Furthermore, Israel�s agents and lobbies make sure that those who do express support for Palestinians end up departing from political life. Politicians around the world fear the long arm of the Zionists who, not unlike a mafia, use all means at their disposal to achieve their goals. Now they are faced with Jeremy Corbyn who is a visionary and charismatic leader that is obviously well liked.

For nearly two years Zionist groups in the UK and particularly within the Labor Party have been conducting a�witch hunt to rid the Labor party of Corbyn supporters, in the hopes of weakening Corbyn himself. The most common and thus far successful tactic was�to claim that they are anti-Semitic. Some fifty members of Labor were suspended including the former mayor of London�Ken Livingston. But the comments made by these members, many of whom have dedicated their lives to fighting racism, fighting for the disenfranchised and promoting tolerance, were not anti-Semitic but rather out of line with the official Zionist platform. This is a platform which allows no discussion regarding the holocaust and no discussion on the ongoing oppression of the Palestinian people by the �Jewish State.�

I had the privilege of being in Brighton recently during�Labor�s conference�and was able to speak at some of fringe events that were dedicated to Palestine. What became clear to me during those days in Brighton is that there were three issue that were problematic, and which I addressed in one of my lectures:

1. Discussing/denying the holocaust while claiming to believe in free speech.

2. Providing people with racist�perspectives a platform to express�their views.

3. Anti-Semitism.

One has to wonder how anyone can claim to believe in free speech yet claim that "holocaust deniers" are criminal. If someone is ill�informed or�ignorant or racist or stupid or all of the above - that is not a crime. It may reflect a person�s own racism,�ignorance or stupidity - whichever the case�may be but reflects nothing on the holocaust and its�millions of victims.�One would argue that denying current and impending disasters and crimes against�humanity is far more serious.�Furthermore, the label "holocaust denier" is too often�thrown at people�who present perspectives of the holocaust that disagree with those who would have a�monopoly on the discourse, i.e. the Zionist establishment. That is�clearly undemocratic and is an insult to the very victims of the holocaust � men women and children of all nations and religions.

2. Are there limits to tolerance? There are those who claim we need to create�spaces for and show tolerance toward people who support Zionism and the state of Israel. It is said that they must be allowed to express their point of view in an effort to show balance. But would this courtesy be shown to the KKK? Should the�proponents of apartheid be given the same opportunity to explain why people of color are inferior to whites? Should there be a platform given to anyone that wants to promote and help the world to understand the merits and virtues of racism? I�believe we should not provide that space, and�I believe that this list includes Zionism. Zionism is as a racist, violent, settler colonial ideology that was and still is�responsible for crimes against�humanity and therefore should not be given a public�space in which to legitimize their ideology.

3.�What is anti-Semitism? When in the UK and�elsewhere�people who have dedicated their lives to promoting tolerance and fighting racism are now called�anti-Semitic and when people are called anti-Semitic�because they support justice in Palestine and people are called anti-Semitic�because they support the Palestinian call for�Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS)�against Israel, then one�wonders, what is antisemitism. Is opposing racism and settler colonialism anti-Semitism? Or is it anti-Semitism only because it is criticism of Israel? Chuck Schumer - US senator from NY, says that BDS is a �modern form of Anti-Semitism.� BDS calls for tolerance,�justice, and�equality - what is anti-Semitic about that?

In his speech at the end of the Labor Conference, Jeremy Corbyn has shown himself to be the single most courageous leader in the West. Having broken every record in modern British history under his leadership, Labor seems to be closer to regaining power and bringing positive change than ever before. Some of the finest and most promising quotes of his speech include:

�Our Manifesto is the program of a modern, progressive socialist party that has rediscovered its roots and its purpose, bucking the trend across Europe.�

�[Labor is] the largest political party in western Europe, with nearly 600,000 members, alongside three million affiliated trade unionists.�

�� terrorism is thriving in a world our governments have helped to shape, with its failed states, military interventions and occupations where millions are forced to flee conflict or hunger.�

�We cannot be silent at the cruel Saudi war in Yemen, while continuing to supply arms to Saudi Arabia, or the crushing of democracy in Egypt or Bahrain, or the tragic loss of life in Congo.�
And perhaps, the finest and most courageous of his statements was, �And let�s give real support to end the oppression of the Palestinian people.� We would be hard pressed to find another Western leader who would dare use these words. Now that Britts are so close to having a real leader who will improve the lives of all Britts and will indeed make the world a better place, they must not allow Israel to interfere with their elections for if they do, they will regret it forever.