This week, the UN estimated that the battle to capture the de facto ISIS capital is costing the lives of 27 civilians a day.
Its not just the almost non-stop aerial bombardment and shelling from the mainly Kurdish Syrian Democratic Forces that the 25,000 or so citizens in ISIS-held parts of the city have to endure. Access to safe drinking water, food and other basic services is at an all-time low with many residents relying on food they had stored up earlier to survive, says UN public information officer David Swanson.
Both ISIS snipers and the US-led coalition have been targeting people trying to flee from the Middle Eastern hellhole. The UN notes that coalition forces have even been attacking boats on the Euphrates River, described as one of the remaining escape routes for civilians.
We can only imagine the headlines if Russia was doing all this. But because its the US and its allies, the international reaction has been muted to say the least. Its revealing to compare the humanitarian concern voiced by pro-war Western politicians and mainstream media outlets when Russia began its military operations in Syria in September 2015, with the lack of concern over whats been happening in Raqqa.
The claim that Russia was fighting terrorists was widely ridiculed. The US and its allies issued a statement saying that Russias actions, which included a strike on a ISIS training camp near Raqqa, would only fuel more extremism and radicalization.
On October 2, 2015, the claim made by then-US President Barack Obama that Russian strikes would only strengthen ISIS made Western news headlines.
Accusations that Russia was committing war crimes also received prominent coverage.
But when the US-led coalition bombs ISIS, the reporting from mainstream outlets is different. Then, the operation is presented much more positively, with little or no talk about how it will strengthen the enemy or fuel more extremism and radicalization. There is also little or no talk of war crimes.
A meticulously-researched Alert from Media Lens earlier this summer compared the coverage of the sieges of Aleppo and Mosul.
When Russian and Syrian forces were bombarding rebel-held East Aleppo last year, newspapers and television screens were full of anguished reporting about the plight of civilians killed, injured, trapped, traumatised or desperately fleeing
By contrast, there was little of this evident in media coverage as the Iraqi city of Mosul, with a population of around one million, was being pulverised by the US-led coalition from 2015; particularly since the massive assault launched last October to liberate the city from ISIS, with victory declared a few days ago.
As I noted here in an earlier Op Edge, it was deemed a Thought Crime by Imperial Truth Enforcers to actually refer to the recapture of eastern Aleppo by Syrian government forces as a liberation. Pro-war Labour MP John Woodcock even went so far as to call the left-wing Morning Star newspaper traitorous scum for daring to defy the gatekeepers and use the L word.
John Woodcock?@JWoodcockMP
They sponsored the Momentum conference. If you associate with this traitorous scum after this front page you've no place in our politicshttps://twitter.com/ianaustinmp/status/808432835912728576
2:41 AM - Dec 13, 2016
But of course, if its the US and its allies doing the bombing, then using the word liberation is de rigueur, regardless of how much death and destruction the liberation causes.
There have been no calls from Inside the Bastille Western politicians or media pundits for people to protest outside US embassies about the number of civilians killed by coalition airstrikes in Raqqa as there were over Aleppo. And absolutely no likening of coalition actions to those of the Nazis.
Its worth noting, too, that while the US and its allies repeatedly called for a humanitarian pause in the fighting for Aleppo, theyve rejected the UN calls for one in Raqqa. Going slower only delays the liberation and subsequently costs more civilians their lives, US Colonel Joe Scrocca, director of public affairs for combined Joint Task Force-Operation Inherent Resolve, toldMiddle East Eye.
Boris Johnson?@BorisJohnson
UK & France call for emergency@UNmeeting & resolution on#Syria.#Assadregime must allow#UNplan for humanitarian access to east#Aleppo
11:53 PM - Nov 29, 2016
beyondpartypolt@beyondpartypolt@BorisJohnsonRemember when you said there'd be a bloodbath in#Aleppoif taken back by Assad?#HumanRightsWatch@bbclysedoucet@jonsnowC4https://twitter.com/sahouraxo/status/889158116503416834
11:17 PM - Jul 24, 2017
What makes the double standards even more outrageous is that without the warmongering actions of the US and its allies in the Middle East, there would be no ISIS/ISIL in the first place. The Coalition is fighting in Raqqa a monster that like Frankenstein in Mary Shelleys famous novel they helped to create. The terrorist organization known by the names of Islamic State, ISIS/ISIL, or Daesh, grew out of the chaos that Bush and Blairs illegal invasion of Iraq had unleashed. As Patrick Cockburn, author of the book The Rise of Islamic State, puts it, ISIS is the child of war.
Furthermore, thespread of ISto Syria was actually welcomed by the US and its allies as a way of weakening the secular Baathist government in Damascus, which Western neocons were desperate to see toppled because of its friendly links with Iran and Russia.
If the situation unravels there is the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist principality in eastern Syria, and this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want, in order to isolate the Syrian regime, which is considered the strategic depth of the Shia expansion (Iraq and Iran), declareda secret US intelligence report, which was declassified in 2015.
In 2016, a leaked tape conversation between US Secretary of State John Kerry and anti-government Syrian activists revealed how the US was pleased to see Islamic State gain territory. The reason Russia came in is because ISIL was getting stronger, Kerry admits, flatly contradicting theclaimsmade publicly by the State Department in October 2015 that Russia wasnt targeting ISIS/ISIL.
Daesh was threatening the possibility of going to Damascus and so forth, Kerry went on. We were watching. We saw that Daesh was growing in strength, and we thought Assad was threatened. We thought, however, we could probably manage. You know, that Assad might then negotiate, hesaid.
The US and its allies didnt just watch with pleasure as ISIS expanded they aided the process. They did this not only by giving money and weaponry to moderate rebels who then surprise, surprise defected to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadis head-chopping outfit, but by targeting forces that were opposed to Islamic State. Israel, for instance, has bombed Syria on countless occasions in the last few years, but each time its attacks have been against those fighting ISIS. An aspect of the conflict in Syria that has not received the attention it undoubtedly deserves, has been the role of the Israeli Air Force (IAF) in acting as the de facto air force of Daesh [ISIS] and sundry other Salafi-jihadi and rebel groups fighting in the country,notesJohn Wight.
We must not forget too that if Washingtons Endless War Lobby had got their way in August 2013, and the US and its allies launched a full-scale military assault on the Syrian government then Islamic State and its affiliates would probably now be in charge of the entire country. Yet the failure to bomb Assad four years ago is still openly regarded as a tragedy by Western regime-change hawks.
Of course, the key role that the US and its coalition have played in the rise and expansion of the forces they are now bombing, is never mentioned in the mainstream reporting of the Battle for Raqqa. Were meant to believe that ISIS fighters appeared likeMr. Bennsshopkeeper as if by magic - and took control of Syrias seventh largest city by complete accident. And, were certainly not meant to ask questions such as From where did these terrorists obtain their weapons? or, Under what legal authority do the US and its allies carry out air strikes in Syria?
My 1987Lonely Planet Guideto Jordan and Syria, says of Raqqa: Theres really nothing to do or see but it can be a good base from which to visit Lake Assad and the walled city of Rasafah, 30km to the south.
The city is most definitely not a good base for tourists today.
One person who did manage to get out of the worst place on Earth earlier this year told RTs Ruptly news agency: The streets are full of dead bodies. The schools were targeted, the bridges, and mosques. The [dead] people are lying on the streets; some people were dragged by cars Dogs were eating the [dead] bodies for there was no one to pick them up.
RT UK?@RTUKnews
Dogs eating bodies: Witnesses recall the horrors of US-led liberation of Raqqa.https://on.rt.com/8icc
8:38 PM - Jul 23, 2017
Dogs eating bodies: Witnesses recall the horrors of US-led liberation of Raqqa RT News
The city of Raqqa, Syria and its countryside are being completely destroyed by the ongoing US-led coalition airstrikes as Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) engage Islamic State fighters for control of...
rt.com
The bombed-out ruins of Raqqa and the rotting corpses lying on its streets are a testament to a liberal interventionist neo-con foreign policy, in all its bloodstained, hypocritical, humanitarian glory.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.
