26 Dec 2024
Monday 16 July 2018 - 10:37
Story Code : 312307

NATO and the puzzle of a nuclear deal with Iran


MNA A meeting of NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) Heads of State and Government was held on Wednesday 11 and Thursday 12 July 2018 in Brussels, Belgium. NATO leaders met in Brussels amidst a terse environment that threatens to further weaken the post-war order.







This year's meeting came at a tense time for transatlantic relations since the USpresident is set to sit down one-on-one with Russian president Vladimir Putin on May 16 in Helsinki. One of the topics the USpresident sought to discuss with his Western counterparts in Brussels was "the nuclear deal with Iran" and its fate. Regarding this controversial issue Time wrote:

After ripping up the Iran nuclear deal in May, the Trump Administration is fanning out across the globe to rally support for a return to economy-crippling sanctions against Tehran.

It continues: The effort comes ahead of President Donald Trumps trip next week to Europe, where he is expected to pressure leaders into joining the far-reaching campaign to handcuff major aspects of Irans economy, including driving oil exports to zero. If European allies dont join, Trump has threatened secondary sanctions on any company that does business with Tehran.

According to the Time and other Western sources, Donald Trump intends to press NATO leaders over the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), and The president hopes his bare-knuckled approach will coerce European leaders to unite behind him, even as they publicly oppose a return to sanctions and scamper to salvage the existing nuclear deal without American participation. This is while the White House keeps to press its European allies for increasing the military and defense budget (to 2% of their GDP).

While the transatlantic tensions are raising day by day due to the imposition of tariffs on steel and aluminum imported from Europe, what meaning can negotiations on the JCPOA imply? Does Trump intend to make a deal with his European partners in this regard? Do NATO's European members welcome the integration of the JCPOA amid their conflicts with the US?

The British Prime Minister Theresa May has recently asked other European countries to remain silent against Trumps actions in imposing tariffs on imported goods from Europe, and not to seek retaliatory measures. She also asked European authorities to negotiate with the USpresident on the JCPOA. Indeed, whats going on among NATO members?

The truth is that in near future, the JCPOA will turn to the Europes leverage for making deals with the United States in security grounds, an issue witch its signs we could well see in the Brussels summit. It shouldnt be forgotten that in its calculations, the EU is still regarding itself as dependent to the United States. Those like Theresa May, Emmanuel Macron and Angela Merkel are adjusting their policies in the international system based on their security dependence on the United States. It might be possible that the European officials agree on restraining Trump, but thats all, and we cant expect them to go further as to fulfil their obligations in this regard. The EU would never confront the USseriously, since resisting against the White House is in no way defined in Europes strategies and tactics.

In the course of the G7 recent meeting in Canada, Donald Trump discussed various subjects with Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, including Iran nuclear deal, tariffs on steel and aluminum imported from Europe, and the increase of NATO defense budget. But these talks resulted in the intensified disagreements among EU member states and Trump. The tensions were so high that the meeting ended with no final statement. Now the USpresident is pursuing the same approach I dealing with NATO states.

Trump and the European countries both regard the tensions raised in the international system as a single package. In this equation, Trump asks the European authorities to cease their support for the JCPOA and the continuation of the nuclear deal in exchange for a decrease in the USeconomic and security pressures. It should be noted that one of the main reasons for the European leaders refusal of offering a conclusive, detailed and effective package to Iran regarding the JCPOA was their secret negotiations with the American officials. Since the U.S. withdrawal from the nuclear deal, Mike Pompeo the American Secretary of State had been constantly in contact with the European troikas foreign ministers, and announced them the exact positions and policies of the USgovernment.

In the course of the NATO summit, we witnessed the continuation of the Europes paradoxical game playing towards the JCPOA. It shouldnt be forgotten that the EUs main strategy towards Iran and the JCPOA, is to make us remain as part of the nuclear deal as long as possible, and without benefiting from its advantages, so that the influence of the USsanctions would be multiplied. The offering of the EUs unacceptable and useless package of proposals is also to be analyzed in the same vein; a weak package which is resulted from the special relations between the USand Europe.


https://theiranproject.com/vdcfx0dmew6dyma.r7iw.html
Your Name
Your Email Address