16 Apr 2024
Saturday 24 November 2018 - 11:30
Story Code : 327869

Iran, Saudi Arabia and a history of American aggression

Middle East Eye | Seyed Hossein Mousavian: In arecentop-ed in The New York Times, Thomas Friedman criticised former US President Barack Obama's bet on Iran and President Donald Trumps bet on Saudi Arabia, noting that both countries responded with their worst impulses.

Friedman argues thatthe Iran nuclear dealwas a bet worth making, but like many critics of the deal, he claims that it enabled Irans overreach in four Arab capitals: Baghdad, Damascus, Sanaa and Beirut. I believe he is wrong.

In the Iran-US wrangling over the past three decades, Tehran has repeatedly delivered on its promises, while the US has fallen short. In the late 1980s, President George HW BushaskedIran to help with the release of Western hostages in Lebanon, vowing goodwill for goodwill. Iran facilitated the release; in return, the US increased pressure on Iran.

The 'axis of evil'

In 2001, when the USaskedfor Irans support in its "war on terror" in Afghanistan, Irans Revolutionary Guard Corps gave crucialintelligenceto the US military. Tehran also played a constructive role inAfghanistanby throwing its full support behind the US-backed president, Hamid Karzai - but President George W Bush responded by putting it on the "axis of evil".

According toRyan Crocker, the former US ambassador to Afghanistan and Iraq, Iranian diplomats were "pragmatic and focused" when it came to assisting in Afghanistan, at one point even producing an extremely valuable map showing the Talibans order of battle just before American military action began.

That all ended after the infamous "axis of evil" speech, as the Iranian leadership concluded that in spite of their cooperation with the American war effort, the United States remained implacably hostile to the Islamic Republic.

Iran also delivered on its promises in the 2015 nuclear deal. The International Atomic Energy agencyrepeatedly confirmedthat Iran was upholding its end of the bargain - but not only did the USwithdraw from the deal, it has also since engaged in a maximum pressure policy, aiming to force Iran to capitulate to its demands.
In his recentstatement, Trump launched straight into an attack on Iran as the root of all evil, rather than immediately addressing what was meant to be the subject at hand, namely Saudi Arabia and the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. Trump should also know that 15 of the 19 hijackers who perpetrated the 9/11 attacks on the United StateswereSaudis. There was not even one Iranian among them.







Carl Bildt

?@carlbildt







Summary of Trump statement today: If you buy US weapons and if you are against Iran - then you can kill and repress as much as you want. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/11/20/trumps-full-statement-giving-saudi-royal-family-pass-jamal-khashoggi-annotated/














Analysis | Trumps statement smearing Jamal Khashoggi and giving Saudi Arabia a pass, annotated


In the exclamation-point-laden statement released before the CIA report is due, Trump makes clear that he's not going to punish Saudi royalty for Khashoggi's killing.



washingtonpost.com











In each of the important episodes outlined above, Iran respected the rules of the game, while the US reneged on its promises. It is also important to recall that Iran's engagements throughout the region predated the nuclear deal. After the 2003 US invasion of Iraq, Iranintervenedin Iraq only after a number of US officials openlycalledfor an American invasion of Iran to follow that of Iraq.

In Syria, Iran's involvement has not happened in a vacuum, either.

Projecting Saudi power

On Saudi Arabia, Friedman argues that Trump vowed to advance US interests in the region by selling $110bn in arms to Saudi Arabia and betting on Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman - but bin Salman "used his carte blanche" toprojectpower and stretch far beyond his capabilities by intervening in Yemen, blockading Qatar, abducting the prime minister of Lebanon,cracking downon female activists and "permitting, if notordering, his team to murder moderate Saudi democracy advocate Jamal Khashoggi".

Friedman is wrong about Saudi Arabia too. The wars in Yemen, Syria and Libya have all been joint Saudi-US campaigns. Moreover, Washington and Riyadh jointly supported Saddams invasion of Iran and the use ofchemical weaponsagainst Iranians. The US turned a blind eye to Saudi Arabia, even though it was well aware of the latterssupportfor extremist groups.

In the 1990s, the Saudis heavily funded madrassas that taught a fundamentalist version of Islam, Obama acknowledged, according to a 2016Atlantic article. The US-backedSaudi campaign in Yemen has led to the worlds worst humanitariandisaster, and has bolstered extremist groups in the region and beyond. Even after the gruesome murder ofKhashoggi, the USimposedsevere sanctions on Iran, but did nothing to punish Saudi Arabia.

US domination

There is no doubt that Obamas strategy was different from Trumps. The competition between the Saudis and the Iranians - which has fuelled proxy wars and chaos in Syria and Iraq and Yemen - requires us to say to our friends as well as to the Iranians that they need to find an effective way to share the neighbourhood and institute some sort of cold peace, Obamatoldthe Atlantic. Yet, despite the Khashoggi affair, Saudi Arabia today lies at the centre of Washingtons strategic and political policy in the region.

The Middle East has been dominated by the US for decades. Multiple wars in the region - from Afghanistan, to Iraq, to Libya, to Yemen - are the real source of instability, sectarian conflict and the rise of terrorist groups such as the Islamic State (IS) and al-Qaeda. Iran has not launched an aggressive war in modern history (unlike the US or Israel), and its leaders have a doctrine of no first strike,"notesUniversity of Michigan history professor Juan Cole.

While the West and some regional actors are concerned about Irans regional influence, Tehran also has serious and legitimate concerns. As a confidence-building measure, all parties to the nuclear deal - including the US - should respect their obligations to foster peace and stability in the Middle East.

-Seyed Hossein Mousavianis Middle East Security and Nuclear Policy Specialist at Princeton University and a former spokesman for Irans nuclear negotiators.His book,The Iranian Nuclear Crisis:A Memoir,was published in 2012 by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.His latest book,Iran and the United States: An Insiders view on the Failed Past and the Road to Peacewas released in May 2014.
https://theiranproject.com/vdcepf8xojh8wvi.1kbj.html
Your Name
Your Email Address