28 Mar 2024
Friday 15 January 2016 - 13:09
Story Code : 196939

America needs Iranian cooperation: Column

New sanctions against Iran will backfire on efforts to restore stability in the Middle East

When the nuclear negotiations between Iran and the P5+1 world powers kicked off with renewed hope after Iranian PresidentHassan Rouhanis inauguration in August 2013, Irans Supreme LeaderAyatollah Ali Khameneiwas quick to endorse the diplomatic efforts but alsostressedthat the U.S. governmentis not trustworthy.

Indeed, the main impediment to normal relations between Iran and the United States since the1979 Islamic Revolutionhas been the mutual mistrust between the two sides. Iran, for its part, has a long list of legitimate grievances.

The U.S.supportedSaddam Husseinin the conflict that began with hisinvasion of Iran in 1980,sparking an eight-year war that cost the lives ofover 300,000 Iraniansand resulted in anestimated $1.19 trillionin damage to both sides.During the war, theIraqi army used chemical weapons against Iran, killing and injuring over50,000 civilians.

The Iran nuclear talks saw for the first time Iran and the United States engaging in serious negotiations at the highest levels after over 35 years of hostility. An Iranian foreign minister and a U.S. secretary of Statesat downand directly talked with one another to resolve one of the most pressing international crises.

In terms of abiding by its commitments under the nuclear deal, known as theJoint Comprehensive Plan of Action(JCPOA), Iran hasdone a commendable job.

According to U.S.Secretary of State John Kerry, Iranhasimplementedits commitments under the agreement in atimely manner, including recentlycompletingthe process of shipping out of the country its 11,000 kg stockpile of low-enriched uranium. Neither the IAEA nor the P5+1 group of nations have everpublicly foundIran to be in violation of either the Nov. 2013 interim deal or the JCPOA.

However, there have been some distressing developments as the JCPOAs implementation day has approached. The more Iran moved to complete its commitments, the more theU.S. Congresshas in parallel explored new ways to impose sanctions on Iran.

Onenotorious exampleis recent visa legislation, which would discouragethe flow of foreign investment and tourism. Even worse than the visa bill, there are also nowreportsof multiple other Iran-related bills circulating in theU.S. House of Representativesthat would undercut the nuclear deal.One seeksto limit the presidents authority to waive sanctions;anotherto prevent sanctions relief for Iranian banks that the JCPOA mandates.

From the Iranian perspective, the JCPOA is a test of whether or not it can trust the United States. One school of thought in Iran holds that Americas policies and nature are based onbullyingand not rationality. Their contention is that if Iran shows flexibility towards the United States, it will only encourage more aggressive behavior towards Iran. Thus, Iran must pursue a tit-for-tat strategy and raise the costs of pursuing aggressive actions against Iran.

The other prevailing school of thought in Iran maintains that you can only deal with the United States if you have substantial bargaining chips. If it were not for the 20,000 centrifuge slap from the previous government [Ahmadinejad] they [the P5+1] would have never sat at the negotiating table, former chief of Irans Revolutionary Guard, Mohsen Rezaei has stated. In response to the recent U.S. move against Iranian missile capability, Rezaei called for Iran to develop missiles with a range of 5,000 km.

The fate of broader U.S.-Iran cooperation rests on whether or not the JCPOA is successfully implemented. The two sides are currently at a critical juncture. If the United States proceeds with expanding sanctions on Iran, even if it does so under the umbrella of terrorism or human rights and does so in ways that do not directly violate the JCPOA, it will make the JCPOA worthless for Iran. Pursing this approach now that Iran has almost completed its commitments under the JCPOA will vindicate the predominant line of thinking in Tehran that the United States cannot be trusted.

The Iranian Revolutionary Guards recent goodwill releasing 10 American sailors that Iran said entered illegally into its territorial waters is a clear example. The White House confirmed the new lines of communication with Iran established during nuclear negotiations were key to getting 10 U.S. Navy sailors released quickly." I doubt if the U.S. government would do the same if two Iranian boats inadvertently drifted into U.S. waters.

The bottom line is that the Middle East is on the verge of total collapse and we need cooperation and not more confrontation. The recent strife between Saudi Arabia and Iran, regional powers that have commanding influence in the Sunni and Shia worlds respectively, has made the Middle East even more volatile. By pursuing legislation to sink the Iran deal, the U.S. Congress will be adding fuel to the fire.

However, the promise of the JCPOA that the United States and Iran could move on to cooperate on fighting ISIL and on solutions to the conflicts in places like Syria, Iraq and Yemen will be lost. U.S. decision makers are faced with a stark choice properly implementing the JCPOA or having to contend with a far more precarious situation in the Middle East. But the choice is theirs.

This article was written by Seyed Hossein Mousavian for USA Today on Jan. 14, 2016. AmbassadorSeyed Hossein Mousavianis a research scholar atPrinceton Universityand a former spokesman for Irans nuclear negotiators. His latest book,Iran and the United States: An Insiders view on the Failed Past and the Road to Peace,was released in May 2014.
https://theiranproject.com/vdcgw39qyak9yy4.5jra.html
Your Name
Your Email Address