Iran ready for a nuclear deal: Mousavian

Tehran, Feb 7, IRNA — Former senior diplomat and spokesman for Iranˈs nuclear negotiators Seyed Hossein Mousavian says Iran is ready for a nuclear deal.
In an editorial column appearing in Friday’s edition of highly circulated USA Today, Mousavian, scholar at Princeton University, says Iran has fulfilled its nuclear promises and it is time for America to make good on sanctions.

The following is the full text of the editorial.

In January, Iran and major powers ended five days of nuclear talks in Geneva and Paris, including lengthy meetings between U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif. Negotiators made ˈlimited progressˈ at nuclear talks, agreed to step up efforts and meet in February.

As it appears, things are moving, and the chances for clinching a final deal look fairly good. But, only if the two sides can successfully resolve the two key remaining points of contention: Iranˈs enrichment capacity and the timetable for lifting sanctions. From the American side, the onus is on Iran. ˈUnless Supreme Leader Khamenei throws his weight behind the adjustments in Iranˈs negotiating positions that are necessary to reach a compromise with the P5+1 countries, there will be no agreement,ˈ as seen by Robert Einhorn, the former US nuclear negotiator. This doesnˈt say it all though.

Almost everybody, in and out of the negotiating teams, admit that unprecedented progress has been made in the extremely tough process. As Wendy Sherman has put it: ˈWe have made impressive progress on issues that originally seemed intractable.ˈ Secretary Kerryˈs recent remarks are also very much encouraging: ˈWe have seen new ideas surface, flexibility emerge, that could, I repeat, could help resolve some issues that had been intractable.ˈ Who should really get the credit for the flexibilities that have made progress possible?

First, according to the letter and spirit of the Joint Plan of Action (JPOA) agreed between Iran and the world powers in November 2013, the comprehensive deal would be based on the Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT), laying out the rights and obligations of parties to the Treaty and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). As stipulated by the NPT and other relevant international regulations, a treaty party would demonstrate the maximum level of transparency by implementing the Nuclear Safeguards Agreement which is obligatory for all NPT members and the Additional Protocol and Subsidiary Arrangement Code 3.1 — which are voluntary. These three specific arrangements are the maximum measures the world powers can expect within the NPT. And the reassuring element in the process is having a clear understanding that Iran would be ready for such a level of commitment within the final deal. Quite a substantial flexibility on Iranˈs part and a major contribution towards a final deal.

Second, based on credible American reports, Iranˈs willingness to compromise on the following important elements of its nuclear program for voluntary confidence-building purposes has been on the table.

Technical conversions at the Arak heavy water facility to ensure significant reduction in the plutonium production capability

Re-purposing the Fordow enrichment facility

Capping the level of enrichment at 5%

Conversion or dilution of most of the 20% enriched uranium.

Cooperation with the IAEA to resolve the Possible Military Dimensions issues (PMDs).

Conversion or export of the 5% enriched uranium beyond domestic needs.

Foregoing reprocessing activities at Arak heavy water facilities

Reduction of the number of operational centrifuges from the current installed 22,000 to around 9,400

Put together, all the above confidence-building measures — which no other NPT member has ever undertaken — should be reassuring enough for the world powers on verifiable transparency for the Iranian program and, more importantly, that the ˈpresumed paths to the bombˈ are effectively blocked.

Thatˈs the manifestation of Iranian goodwill, flexibility and compromise, a clear, unmistakable outcome of the Rouhani administrationˈs outlook and determination, and the professional performance of the new negotiating team. As best characterized by the German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier on Jan. 16 at a press conference in Berlin,ˈ since the arrival of Iranˈs present negotiating team, there came very good progress… talks have already entered a new decisive phase after one decade of negotiations.ˈ

Every keen observer of the Iranian scene is fully aware that this progress has enjoyed the blessing — and explicit open support— of the Supreme Leader. Tehran has already made good on its resolve to reach a comprehensive, lasting deal.

The onus is now on the other sides on the two sticky points: Iranˈs enrichment capacity and the timetable for lifting sanctions. Given that the contract with Russia to provide fuel for the Bushehr power plant expires in 2021, a 5-7 year limit on the current operational centrifuges would enable Iran to produce the needed fuel domestically on time. Will President Obama exhibit the necessary audacity and decide on the Iranˈs practical enrichment capacity and lifting of the UN, multilateral and unilateral sanctions before his departure?

Ambassador Seyed Hossein Mousavian, a scholar at Princeton University and a former spokesman for Iranˈs nuclear negotiators, is author of ˈIran and the United States: An Insiderˈs view on the Failed Past and the Road to Peace.ˈ



The Iran Project is not responsible for the content of quoted articles.