Geneva Despite rising hopes set by an unexpected turn of events, negotiations here between Iran and 6 world powers have ended without an agreement over Tehrans nuclear program. Irans Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and EU Foreign Policy Chief Catherine Ashton said instead tonight that they would reconvene with the P5+1 (Britain, China, Russia and the United States plus Germany) political directors on Nov. 20.A lot of concrete progress has been achieved but some differences remain, said Ashton and Zarif in a joint statement after a meeting that included all the P5+1?s Foreign Ministers apart from Chinas, who sent their Vice Minister.
Obviously the 6 countries may have differences of views, but we are working together. Hopefully we will be able to reach an agreement when we meet again, a smiling Zarif told reporters in the early morning hours of Sunday.
The US Secretary of State John Kerry who has spent many hours with his Iranian counterpart here since his unexpected arrival on Nov. 8 after a brief stop in Tel Aviv was optimistic at his lone press conference following the Iran/EU presser.
Theres no question in my mind that we are closer now, as we leave Geneva, than when we came, said Kerry.
The negotiations were conducted with mutual respect, they were very serious, said Kerry, adding: it takes time to build confidence between countries that have really been at odds for a long time now.
While emphasizing that the United States would not allow Iran to build a nuclear weapon and would retain all options in doing so, the Secretary of State also described forceful diplomacy asa powerful enough weapon to actually be able to defuse the worlds most threatening weapons of mass destruction.
While diplomats involved in negotiations over Irans controversial nuclear program here have been mostly tight-lipped about the details of their meetings, Frances Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius who was reportedly the first to announce that the talks had ended without an agreement vocalized some concerns earlier in the day.
Stating that he is interested in an agreement that is serious and credible, Fabius argued that the initial text made progress but not enough during an interview with France Inter radio on the morning of Nov. 9.
According to Franois Nicoullaud, Frances former ambassador to Tehran (200105), the French position on Irans nuclear program has not changed since Franois Hollande replaced Nicolas Sarkozy on May 12 as President.
We have a kind of continuity in the French administration where the people who advised Mr. Sarkozy are the same ones who advise the current administration, the veteran French diplomat told IPS, adding that Frances relations with Iran were more positive during the Jacques Chirac administration.
This is especially true for the Iranian nuclear case because its very technical and complex and the government really needs to be convinced before it changes its position, he said.
Countering the rising notion that France had played a role in delaying a deal, Zarif, Ashton and Kerry mutually expressed gratitude for all the Foreign Ministers contributions to the negotiations.
Kerry said the prevailing secrecy maintained by the P5+1 was a sign of the seriousness that is taking place and cautioned against jumping to conclusions.
Shortly before Zarif had cautioned against conspiracy theories and reiterated that differences of opinion are normal in such situations while briefing Iranian press, according to the Shargh Daily reformist newspaper.
Speculation that France had postponed a deal arose after Fabius publicly expressedconcernsearly on Nov. 9 over Irans enrichment of 20%-grade uranium and its Arak facility, which is not yet fully operational.
Daryl Kimball, the head of the Arms Control Association, says the Arak facility is more than a year from being completed; it would have to be fully operational for a year to produce spent fuel that could be used to extract plutonium.
Iran does not have a reprocessing plant for plutonium separation; and Arak would be under IAEA safeguards the whole time, he noted in comments printed in theGuardian.
The Arak Reactor certainly presents a proliferation problem, but there is nothing urgent,said Nicoullaud, a veteran diplomat who has previously authored analyses of Irans nuclear activities.
The best solution would be to transform it before completion into a light-water research reactor, which would create less problems, he said, adding: This is perfectly feasible, with help from the outside.
Have we tried to sell this solution to the Iranians? I do not know, said Nicoullaud.
While diplomats involved in the talks have provided few details to the media, its now become clear that the approximately 6-hour meeting on Nov. 8 between Kerry, Zarif and Ashton involved the consideration of a draft agreement presented by the Iranians.
That meeting contributed to hopes that a document would soon be signed until the early morning hours of Nov. 9, when the LA Times reported that after reaching a critical stage, the negotiators were facingobstacles.
There has been some progress, but there is still a gap, Zarif said to reporters on Saturday afternoon according to the Fars News Agency.
Zarif acknowledged Frances concerns but insisted on Irans positions.
We have an attitude and the French have theirs, said Zarif in comments posted in Persian on the Iranian Student News Agency.
In an exclusive Nov. 7 interview withIPS News, Zarif laid out Irans bottom lines in these negotiations.
We want to see a situation where Irans right to the peaceful use of nuclear energy, including enrichment on Iranian territory, is respected and at the same time all sanctions are removed, he said.
We are prepared to address the concerns of the international community in the process, he added.
By Lobe Log
The Iran Project is not responsible for the content of quoted articles.
