18 Apr 2024
Thursday 14 March 2013 - 13:45
Story Code : 22463

Irans threatened lawsuit against Hollywood has no legal basis, experts say

Will a lawsuit from Iran rain on the Argo parade?
According to multiple Iranian news reports, offended officials are contemplating a lawsuit against Hollywood over the allegedly unrealistic portrayal of the nation in Ben Afflecks political thriller, which took home Best Picture at last months Academy Awards.

French lawyer Isabelle Coutant-Peyre is reportedly in Iran, ironing out the details of when and how to file such a suit.

However, some U.S.-based legal experts argue that the rumored lawsuit has no substance.

The thought that the makers of Argo may be sued by the powers that be in Iran should not be given serious thought. Nothing will come of this misplaced idea, not in this country, attorney Stuart Slotnick of Buchanan, Ingersoll & Rooney P.C., told FOX411s Pop Tarts column.

And while no details have been provided as to exactly what Iran found to be offensive about the critically-acclaimed movie, Miami-based entertainment law attorney and U.K. solicitor Steven Kozlowski pointed out that it would be difficult for Iran to prove the film was defamation.

The core historical factual elements of Argo are true. The U.S Embassy was taken, hostages were held and the few who escaped the initial takeover were hidden in the Canadian Ambassadors home. These individuals escaped out of Iran under the guise of being a Canadian film crew, he explained. It is significant to note that while Argo is based on true events, it is in the end a Hollywood movie.

But based on various reviews, it seems some expected Argo to be a more historically accurate flick.

IndieWire called Argo totally inaccurate, former President Jimmy Carter referred to it as great but with falsities, and the Daily Beast dissected an array of things it got wrong, from a one-dimensional picture of life in Iran before the revolution to perpetuating a sterotype that Iranians hate Americans.

Yet Argo was never billed as a documentary, Kozlowski noted.

This type of narrative liberty is common in films based on true events, he said. Iran appears to have a history of making grand rhetorical statements and public threats. The reality is that Irans complaints about Argo may not proceed beyond its public complaints.

But in any case, there have been no shortage of lawsuits against Hollywood filmmakers over the years. And Oscar recognition seems to fuel the desire to file a lawsuit.

Last month, James Cameron and his Lightstorm Entertainment were victorious in a lawsuit brought by a man who claimed his ideas were stolen for the wildly successful film Avatar. Similarly, a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit that a U.S. Army sergeant filed last year against the makers of Blaster One.

Entertainment attorney Barry J. Reiss added there may be a connection between how successful a film is and how many lawsuits get filed against the filmmakers.
After decades of practicing law it never ceases to amaze me that one of the measures of how successful a movie is are the lawsuits that follow, Reiss said. Obviously Argo being the Oscar winner for Best Picture is clearly an indication of a hugely successful film.

Reps for Affleck did not respond to FOX 411s request for comment. Warner Bros. declined to comment on the possible lawsuit.

By Fox News

 

The Iran Project is not responsible for the content of quoted articles.
https://theiranproject.com/vdcip5ar.t1arq2lict.html
Your Name
Your Email Address