20 Apr 2024
Wednesday 27 April 2016 - 16:23
Story Code : 211505

Why do people in the West still believe the official lies about Syria?

Well-documented facts pertaining to the 9/11 wars, all supported by sustainable evidence, have barely made inroads into the collective consciousness of Western media consumers.

The War on Syria is no exception. Despite the presence of five years of sustainable evidence that contradicts the Western narratives, people still believe the official lies.

The consensus of ignorance is sustained by what Michel Chossudovsky describes as an American Inquisition. Beneath the protection of this psychological operation, the engineered enemy is Islam, and the Global War On Terrorism (GWOT) has become a brand to disguise imperial wars of aggression as humanitarian.

Thus, huge sums of public monies are diverted from worthwhile, domestic projects such as healthcare schools and roads, to support a criminal Project for a New American Century (PNAC) that is globalizing death, poverty, and destruction as the U.S led empire tries to impose a unilateral model of control over the world.

The U.S is said to be exceptional, and therefore the rightful ruler. Manifest Destiny writ large.

Dissent is suppressed within the framework of corporate media monopolies. Predominant narratives are supported by corrupt NGOs totally bereft of objectivity -- and intelligence agency fronts. Real investigative journalism offering historical context and legitimate evidence are relegated to the fringes, far outside the domain of the broad-based consensus of misunderstanding.

The Progressive Left has been co-opted. So-called progressives (presumably unwittingly) support Canadas close relationships with Wahabbi Saudi Arabia, Apartheid Israel, and even the foreign mercenaries currently invading Syria (ie ISIS and al Nursra Front/al Qaeda).

The source upon which the pretexts for war are built and perpetrated are taboo topics, despite longstanding evidence that the official narratives explaining the crimes of 9/11 and the subsequent Gladio B operations -- are flawed. The truth is seen as heresy, and fact-based narratives are derided as conspiracy theories.

Thus, a firm foundation of lies that serves as a sanctified justification for global war and terror, remains strong.

But the stakes are high, as Western hegemony presses us closer and closer to a real prospect of widespread nuclear war. Already, the use of nuclear weapons is being normalized through the introduction of mini-nukes into the equation, and the blurring of lines between conventional and nuclear war.

Michel Chossudovsky explains in Is the Bush Administration Planning a Nuclear Holocaust?|Will the US launch Mini-nukes against Iran in Retaliation for Tehran's Non-compliance? that
The Doctrine for Joint Nuclear Operationsoutlines the procedures governing the use of nuclear weapons and the nature of the relationship between nuclear and conventional war operations.

The DJNO states that the:

use of nuclear weapons within a [war] theaterrequires that nuclear and conventional plans be integrated to the greatest extent possible

(DJNO, p 47 italics added, italics added, For further details seeMichel Chossudovsky, Nuclear War against Iran, Jan 2006)

The implications of this integration are far-reaching because once the decision is taken by the Commander in Chief, namely the President of the United States, to launch a joint conventional-nuclear military operation, there is a risk that tactical nuclear weapons could be used without requesting subsequent presidential approval. In this regard, execution procedures under the jurisdiction of the theater commanders pertaining to nuclear weapons are described as flexible and allow for changes in the situation
The taboos need to be lifted, and the repeated lies contradicted.

Some of the more pernicious lies covering the escalating war on the democratic republic of Syria include unsubstantiated memes that fit neatly into the propagandists toolbox of false representations, and of projecting the Wests crimes onto the victims (Syria and Syrians).

The War on Syria is not a civil war; the uprising was not democratic; Assad does not starve his own people; Assad, does not bomb his own people; Assad is the democratically-elected president of Syria, and not a brutal dictator.

Conclusive evidence demonstrates, and has demonstrated for years, that the war is an invasion by Western proxies, which include ISIS and al Qaeda/al Nursra Front, and that there are no moderates.

The initial uprisings were marred by foreign-backed violence perpetrated against innocent people, soldiers, and police. Peaceful grassroots protests were hijacked by these murderous foreign-backed elements (as was the case in Ukraine) all consistent with hybrid war as elaborated by Andrew Korybko.

The illegal sanctions imposed by the West including Canada coupled with terrorist practices of theft and hoarding of humanitarian aid are responsible for the starvation.

Assad is a democratically elected reformer, and hugely popular with Syrians, not a brutal dictator. Claims that he kills his own people were further debunked when the so-called Caesar photos evidence was proven to be a fraud.

Many Syrians criticize Assad for not carpet bombing terrorist occupied areas (as US occupiers did in Fallujah, for example). Syrians sometimes refer to Assad as Mr. Soft Heart.

Unfortunately, though, the well-documented truth is not widely accepted. We need to shatter the Inquisition which serves to protect the criminal cabal perpetrating and orchestrating this global catastrophe. Truth and justice must prevail over lies and crimes. Currently, the opposite is the case.

This article was written by Mark Taliano for American Herald Tribune on Apr. 26, 2016. Mark is a retired high school teacher.
https://theiranproject.com/vdcdzf0xkyt0fk6.em2y.html
Your Name
Your Email Address